The Third World War

It is human nature to want more than we already have. The majority of wars stem from the need of a resource, or a want of territory. Now that oil is becoming a more and more requried fossil fuel, we can expect for there to be a confilt for oil reserves and fields.

A third world war is innevitable. Even if the world unites, conflict WILL continue.


Such is the nature of the human race.

 

If our good friends in Iran decide to launch nukes on israel, we will have to launch on them, then their friends in russia launch on us. A third world war is very possible, and it will mean the end of the world.


The first war was fought with sticks and stones.
The second war was fought with guns.
The third war was fought with nukes.
The fourth war was fought with sticks and stones.

 

That is exactly how it will most likely happen.

I can already see Obama announcing the incident and the intention to retaliate on CNN.

 

I agree.

But we are also missing a key component. 2012? I'm not a buyer into the whole "end of the world", i did my homework and have come to understand that in 2012, the Mayans believed that their gods would come back from their realm and bring about a new era. Their gods were serpent creatures that "created humanity". I am in the belief that our next big war will come soon following 2012, and i believe it may very well be between the species. Between The Annunaki and the human race.

 

Iran or North Koera, probably going to start the war.

 

Lets look at the bigger picture of those 2 countries. Why? Becuz they r both tools. Iran is being used by Russia to try and make US make thr first move. So it doesnt look like they started a war, but instead, came to an allies rescue. China is doing the same exact thing with North Korea. Both China and Russia are US allies, right? And both have the power to stop these smaller allies of themselves, right? And yet they dont do a damn thing about them. That is becuz, like i said, they are tools of these power countries.

 

Aside from the Biblical and sociological, you could see wars as dependent on geography. In that sense you could understand countries as really collections of people living in a defined space. From time to time people of the world fight. They fight for resources, they fight for a good society, and they fight for territory. Eventually, if every area of the world will eventually have war, then what is the constraining factor to define territorial boundaries? The defining factor is geography.

It can be thought that we've past this boundary by mechanizing our wars and thus, presumably for one country to take over the entire planet. This is arguably not possible at this present date.

If one country cannot take over the entire world then there will always be one opponent. At a certain point, according to game theory it will be better for them to get along and eventually make peace. Therefore, there will be territorial boundaries and geographical constraints will probably be where they decide on the actual line.

Why geography is important, is that if the all parts of the world have already been through any kind of war in any of its history, then the territorial boundaries of that country have been defined by geography rather than on any other factor.

Is the worlds’ territorial boundaries been completely defined by territory?
The territorial boundaries have been defined by the discovery of the new world, colonialism, communism, and cultural differences. So, if there was a re-definition of world territorial boundaries that would probably be World War Three.

Where is this going to happen? I'd argue Europe is going to amalgamate to an extent, creating an economic superpower. This new superpower will join the US and probably China. India is the wild card; how far will it industrialize. Essentially, South America is really to far away from Africa or North America to really draw the world into a world war if it was in turmoil so it probably won’t be involved with World War Three. Africa is such a behemoth that no one in the rest of the world would dare to attack it. If any superpower attacked Africa it would have to take the entire thing for it to be profitable. It is possible for Africa to be divided into North, South but that is for another discussion. Therefore, the countries involved in World War Three would have to be North America, Europe, the Middle East, all of Asia, Oceania and Australia.

Now that there is a model for World War Three I would be happy to discuss possible scenarios. I don’t believe the Middle East is World War Three. I see it as essentially another Vietnam. If the US can satisfy the Iraqi people into letting them set-up the country, then the US wins and there is peace. If the people want the US out, then there will be War and the US will eventually have to leave to obtain peace. (It’s assumption in this particular posting that good people are actually in charge and are trying to always be in peace, world or societal). The thing is though, that no other power in the Middle East is powerful enough to defeat the Americans, even a war of a stalemate. The more important point is that no other power will come to the aid of the Middle East. The Middle East would only support a war within its own territorial boundaries and therefore, would not be a World War. Therefore, the US invasion of Iraq is not World War Three.

Some could argue for the nuclear scenario but for all that horror, I will argue for now that Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) has not rendered traditional warfare obsolete. Countries will still fight for territory and we will continue to kill each other. Thus World War Three is on the Horizon. We have only History as our guide.

 

Oh man. I hope a third world war don't continue. The whole world is already in turmoil anyways. We don't need any more.

 

From the homework that I did, it's because the Mayan calander ended in 2011, and the whole of the world but two people of opposite sex have been wiped out before, those two mate and the world begins again.

That's what I remember anyway.

Back on topic, one word. Football, or soccer for you americans, it will bring about another war.

 

@Keyblade Master Roxas: great points, your right, geography has a lot to do with it. Basic and simple, yet knowledgable. What do you think tho about Iran v.s Israel? wouldn't that cause a war? You see, as u pointed out, we dont have to worry about an Iraqv.s US WWIII. But what about Iran?

lmao, football will win, haha.
And as for 2012, idk were u get the opposite sex thing. The Mayans had a myth, that in 2012 the "beginning of a new era" would come about, and their gods would return to bring about a "new world", a "new math", and a "new prosperity". They never said anything about an Adam and Eve thing happening again, haha.

 

i do think we will have a third war war, why, becasue American is a bully to other places, if everybody wants to disrespects there women and treat them like dirt then o well, we can't force them to stop. I mean just look at how everybody is working on bombs and nukes and everything, we aren't the big bad boys here. I think america is going to be put in a third world and we might lose.

 

I agree with you, even tho i am an american. May I ask, what are you? Or more so, where do u come from?

 

oh i hate america, i live here too, but i am not one, i'm african. Not African american, just african. Still, america has always been war, death, lies, cheats, and just immoral to everything. I mean the american dream is a lie to try and make us seem like good ppl, goverment hired people to kill MLK, Malcom X,and the assasains have told this. I think that the two towers was something america did, just think about all the politcle things that went on before it happened. I mean i americans are okay not all of them but 10% are. thats why i think were having a thrid war, cuz were bullies and have greed and want to control things just like the red coats.
(sry spelling is bad, kinda on a broken laptop, can't see cuz screens broke.)

 

I see, i agree with you whole heartedly. 911 was our own government. There was a 100 million dollar insurance deal that was signed 2 weeks before the towers fell, as well as the fact that the buildings "free-falled", and due to the angle of the planes hitting the towers, they would've fallen over, not directly downward. Also, Jeb Bush (George Bush's brother) was in charge of security of the building at the time. Its obvious if you watch all the tapes of 9/11, there were bombs going off inside. There have been reports of hidden interviews of some of the survivors of the attack, some of the people inside the building thought they saw "bombs" in the building as they were running out of their offices.
Besides all of that, I'm a fan of MLK and Malcolm X. Especially Malcom X, although he was a hard core socialist, verging on Commi, he has a quote out there about a war/struggle between the oppressed and the opressors, and how he believes that this war/struggle will not be over the principle of race, but over the principle of freedom.
I love and cherish everything that america stands for, but I know that the image of America has been tarnished since World War I, since the Federal Reserve came into our country, and since we got involved with European affairs. We, America, wouldn't be in so much trouble if we would've continued a sincere isolationism. If we would've stayed neutral in WWI, WW2, then we wouldnt have had the Cold War, Korean War, or the Vietnam War, and we would've prospered in our neutrality while all the other countries plumitted in their death, debt, and war. But no. Somewhere....we went wrong. And like I said before...I think it started when we went back to being friends with Britain. We've become the world's "bouncer", or police officer, when it isn't our place. We have no right to imperialism over small nations. Charity and Imperialism are two different things. So I agree with you Answer Man. Also, I never knew that you were African. Thats is very cool.