Religion

Yeah, Mythril Roxas is right. Mainly considering that Catholics were the first Christian group.

I'm also gonna say that I don't know who you were reffering to when you said that quote on the top of my post.

 

You should have said "main" world religions.

But they're not the same god according to the believers. So my statement still remains true.

But they still do things differently. Its like math, you change one thing in the exercise, and the whole exercise changes.

Technically, i am not.

No, thats wrong. If you actually read the bible, you'll learn that its the truth. You see... its so important, that its the main reason of the world's corruption. Not because of it, but because of the people who interpret it wrong.

By the way, everything can be correctly interpreted. Interpretation is to understand something and to know how to explain it.

There is no better way to interpret it. I rather be honest than be nice.

There is only one religion who correctly interprets the bible the correct way.

People like that usually start little dramas in forums.

 

There was no need to post that. Sorry if i was only mentioning the Catholics. But my opinion is that they are all the same (not technically). They all contradict themselves.

So yeah, your an idiot.

Sorry for the double-post.

 

I'm an idiot for pointing out your mistake?

BTW, it's "you're an idiot."

 

None of us pointed each other's mistake. You just repeated what I said, but in a more detailed manner.

Oh, grammar Nazi, are we? You see, people like you correct others' grammar to make themselves look intelligent or better. But you see, you're not making yourself look intelligent. You think the person who you are correction doesn't know proper English, but what if he/she does? Then I guess you will just be getting your chess board flipped. Now you lost, because now you look unintelligent because you thought that other person was unintelligent, which that proves you wrong. And such an error wouldn't be commited by an intelligent person, would it?

And this is a forum. Why would I bother having proper grammar? I know you understood me, so why even bother?

What will you gain from correcting another person's grammar? A trophy?

 

No, I'll gain the satisfaction of pointing out that the statement "your an idiot" is an oxymoron...Namely that your grammar mistake was impeccably placed.

What you don't realize is that explicitly stating Catholic instead of the group you're actually refering to is discriminatory. It's analogous to the following statement, inspired by the Hiroshima/Nagasaki thread:

Homosexuals are inherently corrupt.

Well, if human beings are inherently corrupt (a statement made in that thread), then by extension so are the homosexuals. But this statement's completely inaccurate, does not encompass the intended purpose and is thus discriminatory against homosexuals.

 

I love the fact that you seem to think that you're better than everybody else by saying that you always win and never lose.

I like that my threads inspire people (Sorry, a little ego trip.)

 

Okay, when did this get into gay rights and $#17?

 

Belief in a higher being(s). Central theme in all religions.

No, its not. It seems you might have a closed mind Sovieto. Thats not good....

read it 5 times, how 'bout you?

Its both. You yourself said that people change its contents, so the BIBLE is corrupt, as a result of the corrupt man who corrupted it.

Yes, but you can't interpret a lie, because that makes your "true interpretation" a lie itslef. Its all about "seeking the truth".

Same here. If I disagree with what someone says, I tell 'em.

From what I've learned, there is no religion thats interprets anything "correctly".

I see later on here that you have drama with Mike....

lol, drama much?

what'd he lose?

lmao, sorry, you make yourself "unintelligent" by trying to prove an intelligent person unintelligent. HAHAHA!

I wish they would....

 

Lulz, you gain satisfaction off correcting me? Then I guess I'll have some fun.

"BTW" isn't a word.

"I'll gain satisfaction of point out..."
It's off, not of.

So???

It's analogous to the following statement, inspired by the Hiroshima/Nagasaki thread:

Homosexuals are inherently corrupt.[/quote]

Just like all of us, homosexuals are corrupt. I'm not a homophobe nor do I hate homosexuals, but I do know they are more corrupt than all of us.

All of us inherited the imperfect from Adam. From where else would we get it? From the sky???

I am willing to end this argument(yes, it is now an argument) since this will never end. This will never end because we are both intelligent individuals.

So I am willing to make friends with you. Note that this isn't a sign of weakness, it is a sign of trying to be a better person.

 

Genltemen, there's a big difference between arguing and debating. I just see arguing right now.

 

lol, I see entertainment!!!

 

No trolling okay?

 

Either Mike is taking too long to post a response, or he just knows that he's wrong. Hmmm...

 

Yes. . .let's wait.

 

That is fine with me...just note that I posted a response, only to have the term 'idiot' thrown at me (which I didn't appreciate the most). But I never consider a truce to be a sign of weakness.

You did miss my point though..it's not that homosexuals aren't corrupt, or in the case of your statement, that Catholics don't contradict themselves. Instead I'm saying that your explicit labelling of Catholics as contradictory wrongfully implies a non-belief in the corruption of other Christians (which as you've said, is not your stance on the issue).

In other words, at first glance you seem like say, a Baptist pointing the finger at Catholics (many of which do). Or perhaps, why miss out on the opportunity to make a stronger conjecture, when you very well could?

EDIT: (In regards to your post, 2 posts above this one) That's not a truce Sovieto.

 

You do realize that we have the same opinion, correct? Oh man, I so love you! XD

EDIT: My previous post was a joke.

 

I understand you Mike.

 

Same here, and you both did present the same opinion.

 

yeah, so why the argueing?