Guns and Games

Oh pretty please point it out to where I said EVERYONE abuses the use of a gun. Besides, I'm not one of those touchy touchy animal lovers who thinks that to use a gun to be like Elmer Fudd, blowing off pretty birds feathers and a duck's head off while chasing wabbits is evil. I have yet to see the reason why there should be restrictions on hunting (Never went hunting myself and wouldn't even care... unless fishing counts. ) If you truly want my opinion of the usage of guns are being abused, yes, then I do believe that the right is being abused.

And you really do not believe that they either wouldn't care or can just cover their tracks? Plus, why should it matter as to whether it was done legally or not. They can be sneaky getting it legally just as much as the next guy getting the gun illegally. Strict laws on not only on purchases but also on getting their hands on one is needed (And who knows how many people are clever enoughto have their ammunitions hidden well from everyone so that they can pass it on to the next person). And as for the "people included in" the many groups that I can think of, I say a huge amount.

Oh please. A crime of negligence. All of us would be guilty for that without even using a gun. I don't even want to talk about a person who "sticks their gun in a cookie jar" (And how many people do you know who even do that anyway?) because to me, that's just dumb for someone to even do that wihtout even thinking. If hiding a gun is so difficult, then the last case scenario would actually be to just ban guns completely. More like having people arguing over this because they may get fined because "regardless where they hid it, someone found it" and regardless if the person did not just "leave it around", it will still be seen in that perspective.

 

Hm... temporary security? Oh yea. We can still die by getting stabbed or get blown up. That sucks so bad. I'm so dumb.

Might as well ban guns from the public completely and just let the police force and maybe those who hunt use them. Let's just face it. If there is no "solution" then we might as well ban guns from the country. Maybe we will have a lower death rate by then and will be up there with China.

 

Oh WOW! Then I guess guns really don't kill people and that people kill people! I give up. If putting a stop to one crime will not do anything, then we might as well put a stop to every single crime as much as we can. Otherwise, we should all agree that this is just a waste of time then. Let us go by what Zac said saying why trying to change something now. I mean, if we put more laws on guns, then there is a possibility that we will end up like Australia. Regardless, more lives are lost anyways so why should I care right now? Looks pointless. I might as well buy me a gun now for my protection. Just give everyone a gun and just take away some of the original gun law restrictions. Let some people have a gun so that we can all show that if they try to shoot at us, we'll shoot back at them. Oh thank you sweet America.

And yes, I understood what you meant by temporary sense of security, which what made me bring up the part about getting burnt and getting stabbed and even getting bullied and jumped on.

 

At least we are not like El Salvador (Supposedly had the highest death rate byguns in 2009. Cannot find any info to see if it lowered or not last year). What is the point? If stopping one crime such as adding more gun laws is going to try to make someone else find a way to do something else as a crime from what I am reading from Vox's post, then there is basically no reason to add restrictions and that we should just give people more guns for more added protection. If Vox wanted to bring up the claim such as using Australia as proof that after banning guns, certain types of crime went up, then why should anyone genuinely care about adding more restrictions to guns? We may reduce death rates but yet something else will come up and then there will be an debate on that. Vox is claiming that there is really no "solution" in even solving anything about gun control and that it is not really changing anything so if it won't make a difference, then why should we care?

As for my couple of posts, I don't know how you cannot understand it (Since Kitty seems to understand) so you might as well reread.

 

Then there needs to be a way in which it can only target those which I have mentioned. You brought up background check so maybe that would work.

But the fact that people want everything down as low as the crime rate can get for them, certainly it can still be a problem, whether it be crime by gun or not.